How do serious Bitcoin holders protect themselves against physical coercion?
I’m researching a security problem that seems different from the usual “someone stole my seed phrase” scenario.
Imagine you hold a life-changing amount of Bitcoin.
Someone physically forces you to unlock your phone / hardware wallet and tells you:
“Send everything to this address now.”
Your keys aren’t stolen. Your wallet isn’t hacked. You are the one authorizing the transaction — under coercion.
I’m curious how people with serious holdings think about this today.
Do you rely on:
- multisig?
- geographically separated keys?
- passphrases / hidden wallets?
- duress or decoy wallets?
- spending limits?
- timelocks?
- trusted guardians?
- keeping only a small amount accessible from your everyday device?
And the question I’m most interested in:
If someone had physical control of you and your signing device, is there currently a way to make it cryptographically impossible to move your long-term holdings immediately?
I’m not asking anyone to share how much they hold or any operational security details.
I’m trying to understand where current self-custody solutions actually break down under physical coercion.
submitted by /u/Born-Salamander-6544
[link] [comments]
